Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 23(12): 958-963, 2022 Dec.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2253970

ABSTRACT

The use of social media (SoMe) has spread worldwide among doctors, scientific societies, and researchers. SoMe offer a powerful platform to accelerate or create new contacts, spread scientific news, and increase visibility. A social media promotion strategy for cardiovascular medicine papers seems to be associated with increased online visibility and a higher number of citations. This effect is independent of the type of article and the total number of followers of the authors. Indeed, SoMe are democratic and even non-senior researchers may be popular on Twitter: your title is not as important as what you do on Twitter. Nevertheless, some physicians may be over-celebrated due to their presence on SoMe. This is why a new author index, the K-index, has been proposed. The K-index correlates the citations of a scientist with the number of Twitter followers. Even scientific journals and societies have recognized the importance of SoMe and in the last years they have appeared on SoMe with official accounts. Therefore, besides the classic impact factor, publishers now pay more and more attention to other parameters, such as the Altmetric score, which takes into account the number of citations, but also the number of downloads, mentions on SoMe, newspapers and tv news, web sites, and blogs. The COVID-19 pandemic has boosted the importance of SoMe for scientific content distribution, particularly for congresses. For all these reasons, it is important to understand the pros and cons of SoMe. It is also possible that SoMe will become a new education medium for continuing medical education.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiology , Cardiovascular System , Social Media , Humans , Pandemics
4.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(3)2021 01 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1067744

ABSTRACT

Coronaviruses (CoVs) represent a large family of RNA viruses that can infect different living species, posing a global threat to human health. CoVs can evade the immune response, replicate within the host, and cause a rapid immune compromise culminating in severe acute respiratory syndrome. In humans, the immune system functions are influenced by physical activity, nutrition, and the absence of respiratory or cardiovascular diseases. This review provides an in-depth study between the interactions of the immune system and coronaviruses in the host to defend against CoVs disease.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiovascular Diseases , Diet , Exercise , Immune System , Respiratory Tract Diseases , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Humans , Respiratory Tract Diseases/epidemiology
5.
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs ; 20(6): 559-570, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-910261

ABSTRACT

In patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), the prevalence of pre-existing cardiovascular diseases is elevated. Moreover, various features, also including pro-thrombotic status, further predispose these patients to increased risk of ischemic cardiovascular events. Thus, the identification of optimal antithrombotic strategies in terms of the risk-benefit ratio and outcome improvement in this setting is crucial. However, debated issues on antithrombotic therapies in patients with COVID-19 are multiple and relevant. In this article, we provide ten questions and answers on risk stratification and antiplatelet/anticoagulant treatments in patients at risk of/with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection based on the scientific evidence gathered during the pandemic.


Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Thrombosis/etiology , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Age Factors , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/pharmacology , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/classification , Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Chemoprevention/adverse effects , Chemoprevention/methods , Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation/drug therapy , Drug Interactions , Humans , Italy , Pandemics , Risk Factors , Risk Management , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , Sex Factors , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Thrombosis/physiopathology
6.
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) ; 21(7): 489-501, 2020 Jul.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-611791

ABSTRACT

Given the high prevalence of preexisting cardiovascular diseases and the increased incidence of adverse cardiovascular events in patients hospitalized for SARS-CoV-2 infection, the identification of optimal antithrombotic approaches in terms of risk/benefit ratio and outcome improvement appears crucial in this setting. In the present position paper we collected current evidence from the literature to provide practical recommendations on the management of antithrombotic therapies (antiplatelet and anticoagulant) in various clinical contexts prevalent during the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak: in-home management of oral anticoagulant therapy; interactions between drugs used in the SARS-CoV-2 infection and antithrombotic agents; in-hospital management of antithrombotic therapies; diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of in-hospital thrombotic complications.


Subject(s)
Atherosclerosis/drug therapy , Atherosclerosis/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Fibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Atherosclerosis/diagnosis , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Comorbidity , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Evidence-Based Medicine , Female , Humans , Incidence , Italy , Male , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , Thrombosis/diagnosis , Thrombosis/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL